Group Pushes To End Disparity In Cocaine Sentences

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — More than a dozen states should eliminate the disparities they maintain in sentencing people charged with crack and powder cocaine crimes, gaps that persist despite changes to federal law last year, a national group that advocates for criminal justice reform said Thursday.

The Sentencing Project said in a report that treating the two types of the same drug differently is not only a fairness issue but a monetary one.

The disparity is unfair to black drug users who are more likely to be charged with crack cocaine offenses and end up with longer prison terms than cocaine users of other races, the Washington, D.C.-based group said. It also leads to long sentences for low-level, nonviolent drug offenders that cost cash-strapped states millions of dollars in prison expenses that could be saved if the disparities were removed.

“Fiscal pressure to tighten state corrections budgets, along with mounting evidence documenting the unfair and unwarranted structure of these sentencing laws, suggests that lawmakers should re-examine the sentencing differential between crack and powder cocaine,” the group said. “High rates of incarceration are expensive to maintain and sentencing changes … can effectively conserve resources without adverse effects on public safety.”

Until last August, the federal government had a 100-to-1 ratio in sentencing people for possession of the two cocaine types. That meant someone caught with 5 grams of crack cocaine was sentenced the same as someone caught with 500 grams of powder. The Fair Sentencing Act signed by President Barack Obama reduced the federal ratio to 18-to-1.

Marc Mauer, executive director of the Sentencing Project, said that’s a good start, but the goal is still to have the disparity removed altogether.

“There’s a fairly broad range of opinion over a number of years about whether penalties at the federal level should be equalized,” Mauer said during a telephone news conference Thursday. “In that regard, the 18-to-1 ratio they ended up with was a compromise. It was a significant change.” But his group believes “equalization of penalties is the direction things should go.”

Thirteen states currently have laws under which people are sentenced more harshly for crack crimes than ones involving powder cocaine. Two of those — Missouri and New Hampshire — have ratios above that of the federal government.

Missouri Rep. Chris Carter, a St. Louis Democrat, said he plans to submit legislation to remove the state’s 75-to-1 ratio as soon as the General Assembly comes back from break.

“The prison system in Missouri is overcrowded and enduring tough budget times,” Carter said during the news conference. “I want to reduce the disparity and begin to empty the prison system of low-level and nonviolent offenders and still keep public safety.”

He said the disparities treat black drug offenders unfairly, noting the crack problem among African-Americans “grows out of joblessness, hopelessness and poor education.”

New Hampshire’s ratio is 28-to-1. Ann Rice, an associate attorney general in the state, said she is not aware of any
proposed legislation in New Hampshire addressing the issue.

The other states that treat the two types of cocaine differently for sentencing purposes are Alabama, Arizona, Iowa, California, Maine, Maryland, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Vermont and Virginia.

Oklahoma state Sen. Constance Johnson cited research in the report concluding that when cocaine is absorbed into the bloodstream and reaches the brain, “its effects on brain chemistry are identical regardless of whether it is in the form of crack or powder.”

“Once upon a time people believed crack cocaine was more dangerous and addictive than powder, but they are the same,”Johnson said. “In Oklahoma we continue that belief with 10-year mandatory minimums for 5 grams of crack and 28 grams of powder.”

While Johnson called the practice of keeping nonviolent criminals behind bars because of the sentencing disparity an
“untenable situation,” she said politicians aren’t falling over themselves trying to reduce prison sentences for crack cocaine users.

“There’s a lack of political will, and concern about appearing soft on crime,” Johnson said.

Prison data breaking down the number of people doing time for crack compared to powder offenses was not available.

(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

  • truthteller

    no one makes drug dealers convert powder cocaine into crack. thats a decision they make freely, while knowing the penalties.

  • White man speaks for justice

    The sentencing disparity has nothing to do with the type of cocaine, but on the “type” of person using it, i.e., blacks who get caught with crack cocaine get longer sentences than whites caught with crack cocanine and blacks who get caught with powdered cocaine get longer sentences than whites caught with powdered cocaine. Same goes with herione and all other illegal drugs. Whites use the most crystal meth–which is ten times more dangerous than any form of cocaine, but you will never see whites getting 15-20 year minimum mandatories in Federal prison. America remains a racist filthy rat hole of a nation as it has been since its creation.

  • STFU

    Unbelievable the way your mind works White Man!!!
    Don’t you think the sentencing and the length of time in jail also has to do with prior convictions.
    Where are you getting your figures and statistics, go back and look again

blog comments powered by Disqus
Track Weather On The Go With Our App!

Listen Live