Defense Argues Robocall Case Is Unconstitutional

BALTIMORE (WJZ)—The First Amendment doesn’t protect fraud. That’s the ruling from a Baltimore judge against the man behind the controversial 2010 Election Night robocalls on behalf of Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Ehrlich.

Derek Valcourt explains the defense argued the entire case goes against the Constitution.

They argue, even if the message in those robocalls wasn’t true, it’s still protected by free speech so they say the whole case should be thrown out.

But the judge didn’t quite see it that way.

On Election Night before the polls were even closed,  that robocall suggested that Governor Martin O’Malley and his allies had already won–hinting to 112,000 registered Democrats who got the call there was no need to go vote.

But since those calls really came from Republican Bob Ehrlich’s campaign, the state prosecutor says those robocalls were an illegal attempt at voter suppression.

He already scored a conviction late last year against campaign manager Paul Schurick, and now he’s going after the man who wrote the robocall– campaign consultant Julius Henson, whose attorneys argued he’s protected by the First Amendment.

“The speech clause in the constitution says that political speech is free, and that they cannot control the content,” said Henson.

Judge Emmanuel Brown ruled Tuesday the voter laws Henson is charged with are constitutional.

Legal expert Byron Warnken predicts the case won’t go well for Henson.

“I think it ends up being a repeat of what happened in the Schurick trial,” Warnken said.

Henson did get one piece of good news.  The judge agreed to drop one of the three conspiracy charges against him– calling the charge redundant.

Jury selection in the case should begin Wednesday morning.

Schurick will find out if he will go to jail for his role in the robocall controversy when he is sentenced Feb. 16.

Comments

One Comment

  1. chetta-ketta says:

    Let the Figger go, my mother said so.

  2. BETTER THINK AGAIN says:

    Does Mr. Henson honestly think that he will be found not guilty? Mr. Shurick was found guilty. I doubt if Mr. Henson will be exonerated.

  3. Should have listened! says:

    What a disaster Owe Malley is! Bet everyone who received those calls would have listened!

  4. Should have listened! says:

    sorry, typo. Meant everyone who received those calls SHOULD have listened!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Baltimore

Track Weather On The Go With Our App!
Your Podcast Network Play.it

Listen Live