Local

Delegate Wants To Ban Arsenic In Chicken Feed

View Comments
chickens generic

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — A Maryland lawmaker said Wednesday that poultry feed containing a known carcinogen should be banned from Maryland farms even though its maker has already stopped selling it voluntarily.

Delegate Tom Hucker, D-Montgomery, told a panel of his colleagues Wednesday that even though Pfizer Inc. has voluntarily suspended the sale of roxarsone, a chemical often put in chicken feed to help the birds grow and fight parasites, he wants the chemical banned here.

Hucker said the chemical and other additives that contain arsenic contaminate chicken meat and waste, polluting soil and the Chesapeake Bay.

“We should look for alternatives, but without a ban, there will be far less market pressure to spend money on research for alternatives,” he said.

Pfizer stopped selling the drug in July after a U.S. Food and Drug Administration study found higher levels of inorganic arsenic in chicken treated with roxarsone than in those that were not fed the chemical.

Perdue Farms, the country’s third-largest chicken company, stopped using it in 2007.

Hucker’s proposal, which was rejected by House Environmental Matters Committee last year, was studied by the Harry R. Hughes Center for Argo-Ecology. The study found that the use of arsenic is unsustainable, Hucker said.

Chicken industry representatives said banning roxarsone and other chemicals with arsenic could hurt Maryland poultry farmers if Pfizer begins to sell the product again after further FDA analysis.

“It’s going to make it tougher for Maryland companies to stay in business,” said Bill Satterfield, executive director of the Delmarva Poultry Industry, Inc. “They’re going to say we cannot afford to have birds grown in Maryland because costs us more.”

Farmers could benefit from a ban if they begin using other products to treat chickens, said Drew Koslow, Choptank Riverkeeper for the Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy. They would have a competitive edge if federal regulators decide to ban the chemical outright, he said.

“We have to figure out how to keep agriculture profitable and protect the Bay at the same time,” Koslow said. “This bill in my mind is a no-brainer. The scientific questions have been answered. We’re talking about a heavy metal, a known carcinogen that we’re spreading on the land.”

(Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,228 other followers