Bay Restoration Ahead Of Schedule, Funding Tight

BALTIMORE (AP) — The federally led strategy to restore the Chesapeake Bay is ahead of schedule for two of three key pollutants, although the cleanup is being held up in some areas by budget concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency said in two reports released Friday.

Reducing nitrogen and sediment pollution is ahead of schedule, while phosphorus reduction is behind schedule. The three are the key pollutants in the bay. Nitrogen and phosphorus come from sources including sewage, fertilizer, auto and power plant emissions. Once they enter the Chesapeake and waterways that feed the bay they can spur oxygen-robbing algae blooms. Sediment that runs off lawns, development sites, farms, roads and other areas can cloud water and bury bay grasses, which provide food and habitat for a number of species.

EPA spokesman Greg Barranco said a new tracking and reporting system for phosphorus offset most of the reductions for the pollutant.

The reports, which detailed progress in fiscal 2011 and plans for fiscal 2012, also said that while the bay restoration effort was ahead of schedule in some areas, some planned restoration work wasn’t funded. For example, the president’s budget for fiscal 2011 requested $900 million for a Land and Water Conservation Fund, which eventually received $301 million.

Despite the tight budget, EPA spokesman Tom Wenz said the federal agencies involved in bay restoration were working together to prioritize where their efforts could have the most impact.

One area that saw increases was the number of monitoring stations around the bay and in waterways that lead to the Chesapeake.

Jim Edwards, acting director of the EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program, said 40 new monitoring stations have been added in fiscal 2011 and 2012, particularly in the upper reaches of the bay and areas that are purely urban or agricultural. Those sites will allow researchers to get a better idea of whether steps being taken to control pollution are actually having an effect, Edwards said.

The reports were issued on the deadline for states to submit their second round of plans for meeting bay restoration goals. The plans are the second set submitted by the six bay watershed states and include how they plan to achieve pollution reductions on the local level.

The states in the Chesapeake watershed are Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, and New York.

(Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

  • issac

    This is nothing more than employment for white collar workers. They get college dreamy eyed youth to do any field work while they burn through millions & the bay never get’s any cleaner. Ever wonder where all the millions has really gone Maryland?

  • Brad

    I would like nothing more than to see the bay restored to a pristine state no matter the cost. The article states that “they” are ahead of schedule in their efforts to help the Chesapeake however, per WBOC news here on the Eastern Shore, the bay grass has declined by 20%. sOMETHING SOUNDS FISHY ASIDE FRO THE BAY.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Track Weather On The Go With Our App!

Listen Live