WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will decide whether it was proper for a single federal judge to throw out a lawsuit challenging Maryland’s 2011 congressional redistricting plan.
The justices on Monday agreed to hear an appeal from a group of Maryland residents who say their First Amendment challenge should have been reviewed by a three-judge panel.READ MORE: Maryland Prepares For Increase In Patients After Roe V. Wade Overturned
Federal law requires a special panel of three judges to hear constitutional redistricting cases unless a single judge who initially considers the case decides it is frivolous or “obviously without merit.”READ MORE: Johns Hopkins Experts Describe Updated Gun Control Laws As 'Great First Step'
After the residents filed their lawsuit, a district court judge decided it didn’t belong before a full panel because it was based on theories the court had previously rejected.
The Maryland residents say any ruling that considers the merits must be heard by three judges.MORE NEWS: Baltimore's Mayor Scott Frees Up $300K In Funding For Pro-Abortion Organizations To Assist Women
(Copyright 2015 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)