By Mike Hellgren

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — Police Commissioner Kevin Davis is opening up to WJZ’s Mike Hellgren about the revelation of a controversial aerial surveillance program over Baltimore, and the harsh criticism it continues to get.

“To send a message to the killers in this city that you just can’t walk up to someone in broad daylight in the middle of the damn street and blow their head off,” said Comm. Davis.

Davis explains to WJZ why he allowed a private contractor to use a plane with a powerful surveillance system to take videos of wide swaths of Baltimore and record them for use in solving crimes. The surveillance has alarmed privacy advocates.

“We had a media strategy, we had a strategy to have conversations with elected officials in the community at large about this, and then the Bloomberg article appeared. So, in hindsight, with a great degree of thoughtfulness, do I wish we had an opportunity to do that before the story broke? Of course,” Comm. Davis said.

Some 300-hours of video were beamed from the sky to a small office above a parking garage behind Power Plant Live! and next to police headquarters, where workers from a private company would sift through them.

It’s not the first surveillance program to draw scrutiny — the FBI conducted its own flights over Baltimore, and police used “stingray” devices to track suspect’s cell phones.

But the backlash this time has been fierce, with a Baltimore Sun editorial saying it “…makes us seriously question the judgment of Commissioner Kevin Davis.”

“We’re not tone deaf to the conversations about transparency, or lack thereof. Now, coincidentally, we also think we’re one of the most transparent police departments in the country right now,” said Davis.

“It wasn’t a secret. It wasn’t something that we were intentionally keeping anybody in the dark about,. We wanted to see if this technology worked,” he added.

The commissioner says a majority of Baltimore murders occur outdoors and outside, and that he hopes the surveillance can help boost the high number of unsolved killings in the city.

Comments (2)
  1. Jeff says:

    I realize that the article I’m quoting from is about CCTV, but the point is still valid. Go Google “London failure CCTV” and you’ll find all the information you’ll ever need about any government attempt to use this philosophy. IT DOESN’T WORK. Here are the snippets from an article I found after less than 30 seconds searching, after watching this news report about Baltimore.

    “After all, that’s how we were sold on CCTV – not mere forensics after the fact, but deterrence. And although study after study has concluded that CCTVs don’t deter most crime (a famous San Francisco study showed that, at best, street crime shifted a few metres down the pavement when the CCTV went up)”

    Another snippet: “After the London riots, one thing is certain: anyone promoting CCTVs for deterrence is most likely selling something, probably CCTVs.”

  2. Jack says:

    If using your own argument if they can push crime out of 32 square miles or 1/3 of the city that would be great. Hopefully it goes to DC.

Leave a Reply to Jack Cancel reply