ANNAPOLIS, Md. (WJZ/AP) — A statue of the U.S. Supreme Court justice who wrote the 1857 Dred Scott decision that upheld slavery and denied citizenship to African Americans was removed from the grounds of the Maryland State House early Friday morning.

The statue of Roger B. Taney was lifted away by a crane at about 2 a.m. It was lowered into a truck and driven away to storage. The bronze statue was erected in 1872, just outside the original front door of the State House.

“I said, yup, it’ll come down overnight, and I was right,” said Meg Kimble of the Annapolis Pottery. “I liked the bookend effect, that we had Taney on one side of the Statehouse and Thurgood Marshall on the other. Unfortunately, with the current events in Charlottesville, it was time for it to come down.”

It’s been Kimble’s view from the Annapolis Pottery for years.

Three of the four voting members of the State House Trust voted by email Wednesday to move the statue.

House Speaker Michael Busch, a Democrat who was one of the three who voted to remove it, wrote this week that the statue “doesn’t belong” on the grounds.

His comments came after the violent protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, last weekend, when violent clashes broke out between white nationalists and counter-protesters. A woman was killed when a car plowed into a crowd of people who were there to condemn the white nationalists, who held a rally prompted by Charlottesville officials’ decision to remove a monument to Robert E. Lee.

Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, said this week that removing the statue of Taney in Maryland was “the right thing to do.” Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford voted on behalf of the administration to remove the statue.

One member of the trust, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, criticized holding the vote without a public meeting.

“This was certainly a matter of such consequence that the transparency of a public meeting and public conversation should have occurred,” Miller, a Democrat, wrote in a letter Thursday to Hogan.

While the statue’s removal was not publicized, a couple dozen onlookers watched as workers started the removal process shortly after midnight. Some who watched cheered as the statue was lifted from its pedestal.

One of them spoke with WJZ’s Alex DeMetrick.

“People like to say that these sort of things are about history and not hate,” said Jameson Marshall, of Fairfax, Virginia. “But you don’t put a monument up… a monument isn’t a history book, it’s meant to honor someone. And when the thing that’s being honored is someone who was for slavery, I don’t see how you can stand by that.”

The statue was removed a couple of days after Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh ordered the removal of four Confederate monuments from the city under the cover of night. A statue of Taney in Baltimore also was removed.

Taney was born in Maryland and practiced law in Frederick, Maryland, before becoming the nation’s fifth chief justice. Dred Scott and his wife Harriet were slaves who sued for their freedom after they were taken from the slave state of Missouri into territory where slavery had been prohibited by the Missouri Compromise.

“The fact that they kind of covered it is like it was never here. I think the taking down of it is as important as the putting up of it,” said Sara Delvillano of Annapolis.

This year marked the 160th anniversary of the 1857 decision. In March, a family member of Taney’s apologized to the family of Scott’s in front of the statue that was removed Friday. Charles Taney IV of Greenwich, Connecticut apologized on behalf of his family to the Scott family and to all African Americans for the “terrible injustice of the Dred Scott decision.” Lynne Jackson, the great-great-granddaughter of Dred Scott, accepted the apology for her family and “all African Americans who have the love of God in their heart so that healing can begin.”

State officials said the removal cost was an estimated $80,000.

Follow @CBSBaltimore on Twitter and like WJZ-TV | CBS Baltimore on Facebook

(© Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (31)
  1. Gary Bohr says:

    Roger Taney is the author of what is widely considered to be the worst Supreme Court decision in history (despite lots of competition—Slaughterhouse Cases, Wickard v Filburn, Korematsu, Roe v Wade, Obamacare, etc.). Despite this his likeness should have remained where it was as a warning to future generations about the effects of arrogance, judicial activism, and legislating from the bench. Taney’s narcissism led him to believe he could write a decision in Dred Scott that was so well-reasoned, so all-encompassing, and so inherently just that the question of slavery could and would never be raised again. What he ended up doing was changing acts of Congress, citing false “facts”, reading out the parts of the Constitution that did not agree with his conclusion, ignoring precedents that conflicted with his opinion, and pushing this nation closer to a civil war. The arrogance exhibited in the travesty known as Dred Scott v Sanford is on display daily in state and federal courts across the nation.

Leave a Reply