RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A report by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation concludes that storm water and sewage plant upgrades intended to help nurse the environmentally-battered bay back to health would create nearly 250,000 jobs.

The report released Tuesday is aimed at countering claims that the multi-state, multi-billion restoration directed by the Environmental Protection Agency will be harmful to the economy and result in job losses, the foundation’s president said.

“That is not borne out by the facts,” William C. Baker said in a statement. “Whether the target is EPA or the bay pollution limits, it is essential that the public understand that environmental regulations will create jobs to reduce pollution, and sustain jobs that depend on clean water.”

The report, called “Debunking the `Job Killer’ Myth,” relies on a variety of industry experts such as engineers, reports and other sources to assess the impact of water pollution projects within the six states and the District of Columbia that comprise the bay’s 64,000-square-mile watershed. It also reviews job-killing threats dating back to 1976 and Henry Ford II claimed that clean air and fuel efficiency standards would “shut down” Ford Motor Co. to illustrate historic claims that environmental efforts are bad for the economy.

The report found instead that sewage and storm water projects could provide work for 240,000 full-time jobs across the bay region — engineering jobs, construction and other employment for new pollution-control projects.

The job projections include the so-called multiplier effect, or jobs created as a result of economic activity because of those upgrades.

“Those jobs are going to be concentrated in the large metropolitan areas because that’s where the greatest concentration of sewage and storm water occurs,” Baker said.

Two key bay states, Virginia and Maryland, plan to invest a total of $3 billion to upgrade sewage treatment plants over more than a decade. That activity alone would create an estimated 60,000 jobs, the report said.

It cites as an example a $305 million storm water pollution control project in Maryland’s Montgomery County that will create 3,300 construction and engineering jobs.

Critics and some state and local officials have publicly questioned the ultimate costs of cleaning the bay, a task taken up by the EPA after decades of failure by the states to deal with its deteriorating environmental health. The bay’s decline has created vast dead zones where no life exists, depleted oyster stocks and harmed other marine life.

The overall cost of what has been called the most ambitious U.S. water pollution control project ever undertaken has been estimated in excess of $30 billion through 2025. It would be achieved through a “pollution diet” to reduce farm and urban runoff, which dumps nutrients in the bay, and improvements to systems that flush polluted water into the 200-mile-long bay.

A state legislative report in Virginia concluded the job could cost state residents $13.6 billion to $15.7 billion. The report added, however, that the cleanup would also bring economic benefits, aiding industries such as tourism and seafood.

Baker said he questions some of those cost claims and said history has shown the true costs are a fraction of “wildly exaggerated” estimates.

“When you think of those construction workers building a sewage treatment plant, you certainly can make the argument that they’re going out and spending more of that money that their making, and that is then going to create jobs in itself,” he said.

Besides the district, Maryland and Virginia, the cleanup plan involves New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware and West Virginia.

The report concluded, “Despite rhetoric to the contrary, environmental regulations have a documented history of causing no harm to the economy, with job losses often more than balanced by jobs created by environmental cleanup.”

(Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

Comments (2)
  1. 1-0-3-0-WITHERSPOON says:

    storm drains need to have a steel graded cover keeps the trash from going into the bay 50 years to late. lets see how long this project takes. because folks in the city don’t no what a trash can is, young and old. the liberals still want to throw more money at the school system, it’s your home up bringing that is the problem

  2. George Helm says:

    This is merely another boondoggle that is purely political and even though it sounds good after the money is spent or diverted elsewhere all we will have is the same issue and definitely more taxes and regulations! The question needs to be asked, What happened to the other funds suposively dedicated to the cleanup of the Bay? I seem to remember the Gov. reaching in and diverting the money to his more worthy judgenments like in state tuition for illegals, sanctuary state status, and gay marriage!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Baltimore

Track Weather On The Go With Our App!
CBS All Access

Watch & Listen LIVE