wjz-13 all-news-99-1-wnew 1057-the-fan 1300logo2_67x35

Local

Jury Selection May Begin Tuesday In Robocalls Trial

View Comments
(Credit: CBS)

(Credit: CBS)

Derek Valcourt 370x278 Derek Valcourt
Derek Valcourt began working at WJZ in September 2002. His first major...
Read More

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up
Popular Entertainment Photo Galleries

POEts: The Legendary, The Celebrity, The Local, The ControversialPOEts: The Legendary, The Celebrity, The Local, The Controversial

Celebrities Born Outside The U.S.Celebrities Born Outside The U.S.

Top Celebrities On TwitterTop Celebrities On Twitter

Ranking Stephen KingRanking Stephen King

Famous Women Who Underwent Double MastectomiesFamous Women Who Underwent Double Mastectomies

» More Photo Galleries

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — The trial is underway for a second man accused of using robocalls to suppress voter turnout on Election Night 2010.

Derek Valcourt has the latest.

With a Baltimore jury already ruling against one of the men behind the robocalls, it is now likely that Henson faces an uphill battle as he tries to prove his innocence in the matter.

A group of supporters followed political consultant Julius Henson to court. He’s hoping to avoid the same fate as Republican Bob Ehrlich’s campaign manager, Paul Schurick, who now awaits sentencing after a jury found him guilty for his role in sending Election Night robocalls to 112,000 registered Democrats in Baltimore City and Prince George’s County hinting there was no need to go vote.

“Basically, the state made a mistake in bringing this case and we’ll prove it,” Henson said.

Henson admits he was also behind the robocalls. His friend and assistant Rhonda Russell is expected to testify that the calls she recorded were intended to be a form of reverse psychology.

“This would stimulate the voters to say `Hey, my vote was going to Ehrlich. He’s down and out; I’m going to go vote for Ehrlich,'” said Russell.

But the state prosecutor sees it differently. He alleges the robocalls violated election laws, amounted to voter suppression and failed to include the required disclosure that the call came from the Ehrlich campaign, charges Henson and his attorney dispute.

“We’re claiming the statute itself is vague, overbroad and unconstitutional under the First Amendment,” said attorney Edward Smith, Jr.

That was one of the pretrial motions the defense made before the judge Monday afternoon. It is expected jury selection will get underway Tuesday.

Ehrlich campaign manager Paul Schurick is scheduled for sentencing on Feb. 16.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus