ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — As Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley prepares to sign legislation legalizing gay marriage, opponents of the bill have cleared one of the first hurdles to asking voters to overturn the law.

The State Board of Elections has approved the language opponents will use when collecting signatures to bring the law to referendum, Mary Cramer Wagner, director of the board’s Voter Registration Division, said Wednesday. The governor was expected to sign the bill into law the next day.

Petition drafts filed by the Maryland Marriage Alliance and Del. Neil Parrott have a few typos that need to be corrected, but are other otherwise compliant with state petition regulations, Wagner said.

Opponents said they will wait for written confirmation from the board to begin collecting signatures.

Parrott, R-Washington, and Maryland Marriage Alliance leaders hosted a news conference Wednesday afternoon, saying they will work together to collect the nearly 56,000 valid voter signatures needed to put the measure on the ballot.

Maryland Marriage Alliance, a group made up of religious organizations and supported by the National Organization for Marriage, is expected to lead the signature-gathering effort. A website Parrott developed last year,, will be used to electronically disseminate petitions.

The website uses voter rolls to fill out a potential signer’s information as it appears in state records, which is a requirement for a signature to be considered valid by the elections board.

In Maryland, petition signers must provide and sign their name exactly as it appears on their voter registration information. A state Court of Appeals ruling last year loosened that standard somewhat by declaring that signatures did not have to be legible.

“We’re supporting the infrastructure, we’re supporting the back end,” Parrott said. “But on the front end it will be Maryland Marriage Alliance, which is (helpful) because they’re going to take it not only through the petition effort, but through the campaign and to November.”

Derek McCoy, director for the Marriage Alliance, would not say how much he expects the group will spend on its campaign to overturn the law and any monetary figure he could provide now would likely be inaccurate.

Supporters of gay marriage in Maryland said they expect to spend more than $500,000 to upholding the law.

McCoy said his group will count on religious leaders to encourage their congregations to support the referendum effort, adding that they will likely be asking church goers to sign the measure at services as early as Sunday.

“You don’t get the right to choose marriage and what it means for everybody and that’s really where we are,” McCoy said.

(Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

Comments (7)
  1. patrick says:

    i am not gay, but i do have a gay stepdaughter. i find it amazing how people oppose this gay marriage bill. we know all heterosexual marriages last forever and some are basically a mockery on the institution.

  2. George M Hopkins says:

    sign me up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. H8NSBAD says:

    Why is it okay to vote on someone elses right to be married? Could anyone imagine if inter-racial marriage, or a woman’s right to vote was put up to a popular vote? If you can’t imagine just look to New Jersey history. They voted down a womans right to vote by referendum! It will also be interesting to see all the names of the people that signed the petition forever frozen like a time capsule. I wonder how they will feel years down the road when they realize they were permanently recorded as being on the wrong side of history? What to tell the gay grandkid then?

  4. Gragost says:

    There is a sign in my neighborhood that reads something to effect of “If you don’t believe in God, you don’t belong in public office.” People like these that will be circulating and signing petitions to stop gay marriage make me want to put up a sign that reads “If you believe in God, you are to bigoted, stupid and callous to be in public office or voting for those in public office.”

  5. Joe says:

    For libs crying about ‘chuch and state’, … why must you have the obvious religious term ‘marriage’?

  6. Lucas says:

    Because obviously you’re too dumb to know that marriage was first and foremost a legal contract.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE